Shannon draws on Philip Flores's framework that all addictions are misguided attempts to meet unmet attachment needs, and connects this to compulsive smartphone use β including how social media companies exploit attachment vulnerabilities to keep users hooked.
37:23Amelia HrubyBut even just, like, the average user who's, like, I just use it for work. Like, it's still a one on one conversation between you and a chatbot that happens in private with the surveillance of the company who owns the AI model. And I think that this has to be, like, even more detrimental for our attachment. It's that kind of, like, narcissistic mirroring back that you mentioned. Like, we're not even asking to be seen by other humans who at least maybe are real on the other side of the screen.
37:51Amelia HrubyNow we're just being asked to be seen by this, like, conglomerate of words that makes slop, that sort of says what we say to it back to us. That's very, like, uncharitable. But I'm so curious for your take on this. And you have a chapter in the book about using AI without losing your sense of self, which I really appreciated because I have noticed that with social media and AI, people who have done that developmental work of cultivating a strong sense of self do seem to be able to engage with these apps or platforms without perhaps, like, exacerbating their anxious or avoidant attachment. But what are you seeing so far with AI and attachment theory?
38:33Amelia HrubyAny thoughts you have, I'd love to hear.
38:35Shannon AlgeoYes. Okay. So there's two ways that I want to talk about this that are different and both very helpful for, I think, this conversation to feel a little more whole. So one is that developing this sense of self. And I think, you know, we're we are alive human beings, and and our attachment relationships and dynamics and and our attachment styles can, as we've discussed, be ever changing.
39:05Shannon AlgeoWe are alive. We're not fixed. And so we need to all be attending to how these technologies are impacting us in the present here and now, like today, this hour, this week. Maybe something that felt good last week is not feeling good this week and, like, to just attend to that. But for those of us who are either like, for young people who are literally developing minds and developing a sense of self for the first time or for people who've experienced relational rupture and trauma that have led to a fractured sense of self.
39:44Shannon AlgeoI'm thinking about a person who's maybe experienced intimate partner violence, DV, people who've had a toxic long term job relationship with a boss, like, people who have a fractured sense of self maybe because like you described, Amelia, you grew up really with a secure attachment, but something happened that chipped away at that self cohesion and that sense of self. We need to be really careful and intentional and discerning about how AI can be used to outsource that, like, that need to feel confident, to feel affirmed. Affirm me. Say what I think. You know?
40:32Shannon AlgeoLike, oh, this is actually feeling good. Oh, I actually I'm actually feeling good about talking to AI about this because I don't wanna risk the vulnerability of having this conversation with a real person because real people haven't really been showing me lately that they can show up and and see me. Luckily, I I don't feel that way right now, but I have felt that way before. So just tracking what kind of vulnerable state we're in when we're going to AI to fill that, you know, when someone's lacking self cohesion, I've heard supervisors and other clinicians talk about it's kinda like there's this hole in the center of the self. And, you know, maybe it's not that simple where there's just like an empty hole, but, like, maybe something got chipped away at, and there's kinda, like, a vulnerability or a weakness or something that's needing love and and healing balm and care.
41:27Shannon AlgeoAnd so when we are experiencing that vulnerability, the type of care that we reach for, whether it's algorithmic, AI, or human, can make a really big difference in how we're experiencing the repair. And and and I think to make this point actually richer, the second thing that I wanna bring in is from a professor, we're gonna kinda get depth psychological, like, and a bit soulful for a second in in the therapeutic relationship. A professor of mine, his name is Ben Heilville. He's a depth psychotherapist and incredible, clinician. And he just did this training about AI and the inexhaustible other and was exploring what it means for therapy clients to be relating to this inexhaustible other.
42:24Shannon AlgeoIn the therapeutic relationship, something that is meant to get activated is this transference and countertransference. The therapeutic relationship is actually meant to facilitate a, hopefully, reparative attachment experience, which means sometimes we we not not sometimes. It means that we come up against the limitations of our human therapist, just like we came up against the limitations of our human caregivers as children. And when that therapist responds in a way that triggers and activates us, how can we, as adults, attend to the limitations of our therapist, hopefully talk about it, and that is the therapy is like processing rupture and repair. So one thing that I've heard clinicians exploring is what does it mean that that therapy clients are now outsourcing part of the therapeutic process to this inexhaustible large language model.
43:28Shannon AlgeoInexhaustible meaning it is presenting to have no limitations, to meet all needs immediately, to to create this veneer of intimacy, to offer what we want to hear even as no one is there. There's no soul there providing that transmission of care. And in the depth psychological field, there's this idea of intersubjectivity where it's not just Shannon and Amelia here. There's also this third intersubjective energy that Shannon and Amelia co create between our unique constellation of relationality. And so so there's, like, this third entity coming into the therapeutic relationship where it's actually now the therapist, the client or patient, and this other perspective that is in that is often influencing the therapy, especially if clients are talking about really personal material.
44:39Shannon AlgeoSo I I don't know. I just love talking about this. Forgive me if you're listening and this is a little too, like like, psychological geeky here. But I think, like, remembering the richness of human connection. And this isn't just woo woo Jungian.
44:56Shannon AlgeoIt's also deeply interpersonal and neurobiological. If you go into Dan Siegel's work of the resonance and coherence that gets transmitted between people's brain states, where we actually get into a flow of coherence when we are in flow with another person, that is not happening when we are in relationship with AI, but we are being given this sort of plastic surgery kind of phantom shell of it kind of feels good to be told that I'm brilliant. There is that kind of like, oh my god. Am I am I amazing? Because AI kind of like feels like so talking about me like I'm amazing, but is that actually satiating?
45:51Shannon AlgeoAnd I think the answer is no.
45:53Amelia HrubyYeah. The answer is you are amazing, but AI telling you that kinda means nothing.
45:58Shannon AlgeoOh my god. I need to spin around myself, but I'm gonna get tied up in my headphones. I'm just dancing here with
46:05Amelia Hrubyyes. I'm completely tracking with you. I've gotten really into doctor Jacob Hom's work, the therapist from What My Bones Know, the complex PTSD memoir that Stephanie Fu wrote. And I've listened to, like, every single podcast episode he's ever done. And he talks a lot about that very specific relationship between therapist and patient or client and the risks that you have to take, and he talks about them as human relational risks.
46:34Amelia HrubyAnd he's talking about exactly this, that, like, that relationship is one in which we take those risks such as to repair relational harm, and it has to become this, like, opening and practice ground, and there has to be a rupture in that for healing to come through, and there is none of that when we are talking to AI. And, you know, in my opinion, like nothing you or I just said means that people can't, like, use AI to schedule a meeting, but it does mean that you can't use AI to meaningfully heal on a human level. And, you know, here at Off the Grid, we're mostly talking about business and creativity. And so the sort of, like, aspect of AI that comes up a lot is, like, people using AI to generate writing in their business. Like, is AI writing your emails?
47:23Amelia HrubyIs AI writing your book? And I was talking to a friend the other day, and they were sort of just, like, talking about someone they knew who was, like, writing all their emails with AI. And they're like, I just keep getting these emails, and nobody is writing them. And that really stuck with me. I was like, if AI is doing all the writing, all the editing, and all you're doing is, like, putting it into the email client to send it, like, nobody is writing the emails.
47:48Amelia HrubyAnd that is kinda how I feel when people go to AI for psychological support or something that they're calling therapy. I'm like, nobody is saying this to you. Nobody is healing here. Like, it's a nobody.
48:02Shannon AlgeoIt's a nobody. It's a nobody.
48:05Amelia HrubyYeah. And, again, it's like, maybe you can have a conversation like that that does, like, give you a new thought or spark something in your mind. But taking it back to attachment theory, like, that is happening in our nervous system. And a nobody cannot experience or understand that.
48:27Shannon AlgeoJust even on a a simple level, it's important to notice how you feel in your body when you are on AI or if you're if you are using AI. I've noticed I become incredibly dysregulated, flooded, and overwhelmed. When I use AI, the quickening, the the speed, the stimulation, the sympathetic nervous system response that I feel, Like, oh my god. I have so much to read. Oh my gosh.
49:03Shannon AlgeoIs this worth reading? Oh my like, is this even what I want to be reading? Do I need to be prompting it better? Can I trust this? What does it mean if I believe what it's saying?
49:12Shannon AlgeoDo I need to, like, resist what it's saying? Like, I just feel often so overwhelmed, especially like, if I go in and I use Claude for, like, one quick thing, that I usually feel, like, pretty fine about. But if I get into, like, a process, I get lost. I feel really lost. I have trouble tracking what's even happening.
49:38Shannon AlgeoI so just full disclosure, I do not use AI to write emails, and I have a signature in my signature, it says this email was written by me, Shannon Algio. I think it's incredibly important whether you use AI or not to disclose. We need to know who we're talking to and if we're talking to a who. And I think it's incredibly important to have that transparency, and I loved your AI series on off the grid and about having an AI business policy, etcetera, etcetera. So so important.
50:11Shannon AlgeoAnd I it's just so important, like, for me. I'm a writer. I've been a writer since, like, middle school. I was, like, a language arts girly, like, not so great with the maths, but give her some words, and she'll she'll write you
50:27Amelia Hrubya poem. There are poems in your book.
50:30Shannon AlgeoThere are literally poems in my book. I love I I like writing. I like writing. And I feel, especially with, like, book launch energy, I feel the pressure of commerce and capitalism pushing me to go faster and do more, and I feel those temptations of wouldn't it be nice if I just had I mean, I don't really have this thought because I'm opposed to it, but I have the temptation, the the felt sense of wanting the relief of AI to just, like, I've already written so much about this book. I've sent so many emails.
51:01Shannon AlgeoCan you just, like, write me five emails to send to my email list? That would be that would I mean, saying it right now, I'm like, that sounds amazing. And I'm not doing that. I'm not doing that because I I well, back it up a second. We need to I think we must ask what it means to farm out our creativity to another source of of a computer system, a large language model because something I am so passionate about is who I become when I go through the process of writing a book.
51:43Shannon AlgeoThis book, The Power in Your Hands, has been in the works for four years. It has been an initiation. There is blood, sweat, and tears that have gone into these pages, and it and this book changed me. This book was me reckoning with my own addiction to technology. And this book was a proof of concept for myself and my soul that I could still create even I could overcome my attachment to technology to write a 95,000 word book.
52:17Shannon AlgeoI still have poetry in me, and that proof of concept is a proof of self. It's a sense of self that I get to hold now knowing and I get to tell you, Amelia, with full honesty and transparency that I wrote this book, and no one can take that feeling away from me. And that's pride, and that is self cohesion. And so I want everyone who's a creative and an artist or or someone who's even, like, in the process of re identifying as a creative and an artist for the first time to really wonder about this initiation that gets activated when we do the hard work of making something. And I just don't think that that can get taken away from us.
53:04Shannon AlgeoWe can't let it. And I also just don't think that it can happen.
53:09Amelia HrubyYeah. Like the product of anything that a chatbot's gonna write or make for you is not going to be the same as what you would create having gone through that initiation. Like, it's not possible for it to recreate that, and so much is lost when we attempt to do that. But what I'm really appreciating about everything you're saying though is, like, the shared deeply held commitment we have to the creative process, as well as to the self discovery process. And what I can tell is a shared belief that we know that's something that only we can do, and it must be done in relationship with other human beings, plants, animals, living bodies on this planet.
53:53Amelia HrubyRight? And within that, you know, I have chosen to not use social media and not use AI or generative AI, at least for this year. And you are engaging with social media and in limited ways with AI as well. And we can still both hold that commitment and have different behaviors and different relationships to the technology and reckon with the harms of it at the same time. So I just wanna name that too.
54:20Amelia HrubyLike, we're not here saying that if you want to experience secure attachment, you can never open Instagram again, or you can never look at Claude. Right? To me, what it comes back to is, like, once you are aware of the very real harms that these technologies do to our attachment systems and to our creativity, then you can be in that sort of constant conversation with yourself of, what am I going to this for? How is it impacting me? How does my body feel as I use it?
54:56Amelia HrubyAnd in my experience, if you can stay in that conversation and be honest with yourself there, then you can maintain your, like, cohesive self even as you move through the world. And frankly, we all have to do that because we live under white supremacists, patriarchal capitalism. So, like, everyone is having to confront the harms of our systems and try to stay whole in the face of them. But I just want us all to be a little more awake to what the technology itself is doing in that process.
55:27Shannon AlgeoYeah. And I I can't tell you how many times I think about and share about your description of attention ecology through your attention is sacred except on social media, which I have right here on my desk and I recommend to so many people. But the Robin Wall Kimmerer analogy of the ecology that we all exist in, that none of us would be here if if there were not a planet and a Milky Way and a cosmos. And this solar system, and this Earth, and the land that we're on, and and the seasons that we are in relationship with. And that within that is this economy of human care and food and shelter and the ways that in which we take care of one another and in the ways in which we are challenged to.
56:16Shannon AlgeoAnd that from there, when those two are interwoven, we can find that beautiful, like, essential soul purpose, that spiritual, that higher purpose. I really like James Williams. Have you heard of the spotlight, the starlight, and the daylight when talking about attention? So spotlight attention is like, I have the ability to focus. Like, I can direct my focus, or can I direct my focus on what I want to be paying attention to in a given moment?
56:48Shannon AlgeoSo we have spotlight attention. Like, look at Amelia. Don't look outside right now. Then we have this starlight attention, which is this capacity to determine our higher values, our goals, and values kind of like looking at the stars. Like, what is important to me?
57:11Shannon AlgeoWhat do I wanna orient towards? Kinda orienting towards our stars. And then the daylight is the the just the whole picture, the the being able to see, have metacognition, insight, self reflection, and that attending to these different qualities of attention, the spotlight, the starlight, our goals and values, and the daylight, our ability to want what we want to want. Like, the daylight is allow allows us to orient towards, you know, what is this ecosystem that I'm in that even allows for my goals and values to come forward? And I just I love that, like, multidimensional expression of attention because it just feels true that attention is so many things.
58:00Amelia HrubyI think that's such a beautiful framework. And what it's reminding me of now is that there is so much to attend to and tend to in our lives. And the reason that you wrote this book and we had this conversation is not to, like, get us all mired in attachment and be like, oh, no. Am I anxiously attached? Am I violently attached?
58:25Amelia HrubyIs this like, it's not that. It's so that we can have a baseline of knowing some of our patterns and tendencies of reaching toward that sense of cohesion, secure attachment, a clear and whole sense of self. Because from that place, we can attend to so much more. Right? It's like from that place, we can actually do the spotlight, starlight, and daylight with joy and pleasure and in the ways that we desire.
58:56Amelia HrubySo I think this is really beautifully woven together, attachment, addiction, and attention as all part of one ecological conversation. And I'm feeling really just, like, held by everything that we brought in today.
59:14Shannon AlgeoYeah. Me too. I really so appreciate the reflections and the ideas that you've brought here, Amelia. And I my hope is not that this book is, like, includes everything that you need to know and all the solutions for us to break free from tech addiction and five simple steps that I actually wanted to write the opposite of that kind of book. I wanted to write a book that maybe made people feel, like, a little lost at times or, like, one not lost, like, I don't know where I am, but, like, wondering, how does this apply to my life?
59:48Shannon AlgeoWhat do I do with this information? And one of the things that I really bring in, because this is what I did, what was experimentation, playing with little tiny but significant experiences of getting offline and getting into the built world in our lives. And that involves protecting ourselves from digital spaces at times so that we can access our humanity, our deeper psyche and soul, our creative capacity, our the relational satisfaction. I noticed when I do these sacred slow offline fasts, these digital fasts for like forty hours, I am so much more invested in the people I bump into at the cafe. I let myself get into longer conversations.